Proctoring systems are software programs that use webcams, microphones, and other tools to monitor students during online exams. The aim of proctoring systems is to prevent cheating and maintain academic integrity. However, they are not without controversy. The pros of proctoring systems are clear. They allow educators to monitor students during online exams and ensure that they are not cheating. This is especially important in the current climate, where many students are taking online courses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Proctoring systems can also reduce instances of academic dishonesty, which can negatively impact the reputation of educational institutions. On the other hand, there are also cons to proctoring systems. Some students feel that they are invasive and violate their privacy. There have also been instances where proctoring systems have been found to be discriminatory towards students with disabilities or students who do not have access to high-quality technology. While proctoring systems can be a useful tool for maintaining academic integrity, they are not a perfect solution yet. It is important for educators to weigh the pros and cons of proctoring systems and consider alternative approaches to preventing cheating, such as open-book exams or project-based assessments. What do you think is the best way to ensure academic integrity in online exams? Let us know what you think in the comments.

Face recognition technology has become increasingly popular for proctoring systems used in education, particularly in MOOC courses where large numbers of students need to be monitored during exams and assessments. Proponents argue that it can help prevent cheating and ensure the integrity of the assessment process. However, there are concerns about the potential invasiveness and ethical implications of using such technology. Students may feel uncomfortable with being constantly monitored, particularly if they have concerns about their privacy. There is also the risk that the technology may not be accurate, leading to false accusations of cheating and damaging students' academic reputations. As with any technology, it is important to carefully consider the implications of using face recognition for proctoring in education. What are your thoughts on the use of face recognition technology in education? Do you think it is necessary for ensuring academic integrity, or are there better alternatives? Share your thoughts in the comments below.